We’re looking to add another paid search specialist to our marketing team at Full Sail. The ideal candidate would be someone with a year or 2 of direct hands on experience with managing PPC accounts in Google AdWords, Yahoo Search Marketing and MSN AdCenter. You would be working with a team of other talented search marketers in a very creative and fun environment but with an emphasis put on delivering results.
Full Sail is an incredible place to work and if you have some basic experience with PPC or even just have dipped your toe in the water and have a real desire to jump head long into this growing area of marketing, send us your resume!
4 Comments
By the way, if you are an internet marketing agency who thinks responding to in house job openings is a good way to drum up business, think again. It’s likely I will publicly shame you for trying to steal away jobs from people. I find that act deplorable and it disgusts me that it happens fairly regularly.
Perhaps you can explain better your point of view that an agency responding to an ad for an open position is deplorable? I find that mindset extremely short sighted. An agency can provide a company many benefits, one of the main is the cost savings the company will realize in not having to outlay money for employee benefits and taxes.
I do not own an agency, nor do I work for one, but I had to comment about your position as you feel so strongly about it. In fact there are many situations and cases where an agency can provide a more cost effective solution to an organization where there are job openings available.
@Chris Cooper: Thanks for your comment. Well, a couple things. When you are placing an ad for a job, you are seeking in house person. If we were interested in an agency, we would have put out an RFP. When I have hundreds of resumes to look through, the signal to noise ratio is already high, agencies getting in the mix only make my job harder and it makes an agency look a little spammish, in all honesty.
As to benefits of an agency, sure there are benefits but those end as soon as you reach a certain threshold of work needed. Basic math and logic will show that that once you have 40 hours a week of work to be done, paying someone a salary for their full undivided attention day in day out yields much better ROI than paying the same amount for maybe a quarter of the attention. In addition, an agency is not as close to the ground and will not know the nuances of your organization and offerings and business goals as someone who is on site every day. Sure, you could say, if an agency is given the same access and time to work with a company they could produce similar results, but then you are paying a premium fee, thus the in houser is more cost effective.
Don’t get me wrong, the experience and skill of an agency is ideal for a business just getting their feet wet with internet marketing, but I couldn’t dream of trading a team of in house marketers for a few hours a week of an agency’s time. If you place internet marketing at the level of importance any company truly should, then you really need to staff the efforts, not out source. Think of it this way: if you are paying a salary to a person to answer phones and book appointments, then why would you do anything less for a major driving factor of your business development and income?
I forgot to add that I also find the act deplorable as you are trying to take a paying position away from people who want to put food on their table. A company is trying to provide an opportunity to a person to earn a paycheck and possibly grow a career with a company. In today’s economy trying to job-block like that is pretty shitty.