MSNBC’s David Shuster expresses his negative opinion on Clinton using her daughter to call celebrities and super delegates on her behalf by using the phrase “pimping out” to describe the strategy. The result? Everyone goes apeshit.
I don’t know if I agree with his opinion or not, but I do know that Shuster wasn’t suggesting Chelsea was actually being used to exchange sex for votes. It’s a figure of speech folks, and a pretty common one. Anyone who took issue with the statement merely on the basis of the phrase “pimping out” is a big fat idiot. Why don’t you discuss the point he raises instead of incorrectly taking a figure of speech literally and then arguing against that.
